MENUMENU
  • EDITORIAL COMMITTEE
    • Alaka BasuAlaka Basu
      Alaka M. Basu is Professor, Development Sociology, Cornell University, and a member of the Guttmacher-Lancet Commission on Sexual and Reproductive Rights and Health
      Alessandro RosinaAlessandro Rosina
      Professor of Demography and Director, Center for Applied Statistics in Business and Economics, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore
      Andrea BrandoliniAndrea Brandolini
      Head of Statistical Analysis Directorate, Bank of Italy
      Bruno MasquelierBruno Masquelier
      Professor of Demography, University of Louvain, Belgium
      Cheikh MbackéCheikh Mbacké
      Associate Professor, Sociology department, Laval University
      Cinzia ContiCinzia Conti
      Researcher at Istat, Head of Unit on Foreign Presence and Social Dynamics
      Corrado BonifaziCorrado Bonifazi
      Director of the Institute for Research on Population and Social Policies, National Research Council, Rome Italy
      Ernestina CoastErnestina Coast
      Associate Professor of Population Studies, London School of Economics
      Wang FengFeng Wang
      Professor of Sociology at the University of California, Irvine, USA, and Professor at Fudan University, Shanghai, China fwang(at)uci.edu
      Francesco BillariFrancesco Billari
      Professor of Sociology and Demography, University of Oxford
      Gilles PisonGilles Pison
      Professor at Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle and Director of Research at the French National Institute for Demographic Studies (INED) (Paris)
      Gustavo De SantisGustavo De Santis
      Professor of Demography, University of Florence, Italy
      Jacques VallinJacques Vallin
      Emeritus Research Director at INED, Paris; Honorary President of IUSSP
      John KnodelJohn Knodel
      Research Professor Emeritus, Population Studies Center, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan (USA) and International staff, College of Populations Studies, Chulalongkorn University (Thailand)
      Letizia MencariniLetizia Mencarini
      Associate professor of Demography, Bocconi University - Dondena Centre for Research on Social Dynamics and Public Policy & Collegio Carlo Alberto; P.I. ERC P.I. ERC project n. 313617 (2013-2018) SWELLFER http://swellfer.wordpress.com
      Letizia TanturriLetizia Tanturri
      Associate Professor of Demography, University of Padova, Italy
      Massimo livi BacciMassimo livi Bacci
      Emeritus Professor of Demography, University of Florence, Italy
      Monica Das GuptaMonica Das Gupta
      Research Professor of Sociology, University of Maryland, USA
      OUR AUTHORS
      Paula Miranda-RibeiroPaula Miranda-Ribeiro
      Professor, Demography Department and Cedeplar, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Brazil.
      Peter McDonaldPeter McDonald
      Professor of Demography in the Australian National University. Honorary President of IUSSP and winner of the Irene B. Taeuber Award
      Roberto ImpicciatoreRoberto Impicciatore
      Assistant Professor of Demography, University of Milan, Italy
      Salvatore StrozzaSalvatore Strozza
      Professor of Demography, University Federico II, Naples (Italy)
      Stefano MolinaStefano Molina
      Senior Program Officer, Giovanni Agnelli Foundation, Italy
      our authors
  • N-IUSSP
    • N-IUSSP is a new IUSSP news magazine, which will disseminate scientific findings from demographic research carried out all over the world. The practical implications of current trends, the risks and potentialities of emerging situations, the pros and cons of specific laws are discussed in rigorous but plain language.

      Everybody is free to reproduce our articles, for free, provided the original source is cited.

      You are invited to contribute to this new publication: please check our guidelines and submit your 1000 word contribution to contact@niussp.org

Present and future of female genital mutilation/cutting in Europe
Mutilations génitales féminines/excision en Europe: état des lieux et perspectives

Livia Elisa Ortensi
Female genital mutilation

Although previously unknown among natives in EU28, the practice of female genital mutilation/cutting is a present concern for European policymakers. As many as 500,000 foreign-born girls and women in Europe have probably undergone the practice and, according to projections, Livia Elisa Ortensi warns, their number will rise at a rapid pace in the next decades.

The phenomenon

Female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C) is a harmful traditional practice that includes all procedures that intentionally alter the female genital organs for non-medical reasons. It is internationally recognized as a violation of the human rights of children and women, and is considered as a form of gender-based violence and one of the many manifestations of gender inequality (EIGE 2013). The practice of FGM/C is highly concentrated across a vast geographical area of Africa that goes from the Atlantic coast to the Horn of Africa, in areas of the Middle East such as Iraq and Yemen and some countries in Asia like Indonesia. The most recent global estimate of the phenomenon based on evidence from large-scale representative surveys carried out in 30 countries hypothesizes that at least 200 million girls and women living in practicing countries have been subjected to FGM/C (UNICEF 2016).

Although it occurs differently across communities, research has underlined some recurrent factors underpinning FGM/C, such as cultural tradition, sexual morals, marriageability, religion, health benefits, male sexual enjoyment and a common concern for the normative regulation of biological and social reproduction (Berg and Denison 2013, Andro and Lesclingand, 2017).

While migration from FGM/C practicing countries is overwhelmingly intra-continental, since the late 1980s the acceleration and diversification of emigration flows beyond colonial patterns, especially from Africa to Europe and North America, has led to increasing prevalence of FGM/C in areas where it was previously unknown (UNICEF 2013). Consequently, EU Member States have witnessed a constant increase in the number of women with FGM/C seeking health care, assistance and in some cases asylum (EIGE 2013). (Fig. 1)

 

It is difficult to estimate the number of migrants with FGM/C. To do so, scholars must overcome two major challenges: first, to assess FGM/C prevalence among migrants of different national groups, and second, to determine the number of women living outside their country of origin (Ortensi et al., 2015). Applying different methods of prevalence estimation or failing to use comparable data makes it impossible to compare studies across countries.

Estimates for Europe: present and future

The first and most recent estimate at the European level is based on the 2011 census data and takes into consideration only first generation women aged 10 years and over (Van Baelen et al., 2016). The study suggests that around half a million women and girls from FGM/C practicing countries and living in the EU28 may have undergone FGM/C. Two in three were living in the UK, France, and Italy, one in two was born in East-Africa. These data do not include second-generation girls or first-generation girls younger than 10 (Table 1).

Most European qualitative and quantitative studies show a gradual distancing from the practice in migrant populations and a change in attitudes towards it in many communities, implying a dramatically lower risk of undergoing FGM/C for second-generation girls than what would be expected in their parents’ home countries (Johnsdotter et al. 2009; Farina and Ortensi 2014). Therefore, even if the incidence of the practice is decreasing in many countries (Andro and Lesclingand, 2017), most of the growth in the number of women and girls affected by FGM/C in the future will be the consequence of demographic growth and immigration from practicing countries. The demographic context of FGM/C practicing countries suggests that overall migration, and especially female migration, from these areas towards western countries will increase in the coming years, bringing new women with FGM/C into Europe.

According to recent demography-driven and FGM/C trend-based projections corrected according to the hypothesis of migrant selection, the EU28 countries will receive a flow of around 400,000 women from FGM/C practicing countries between 2016 and 2020. About one-third of them, corresponding to an estimated 127,000, will have likely undergone FGM/C before migration (Ortensi and Menonna, 2017).

If projections are extended to the period 2016-2030, the overall expected flow of migrants will exceed 1.3 million women, corresponding to more than 400,000 with FGM/C.

France is expected to be the main receiving country of females with FGM/C in the coming years, with around 20% of the total number of cut women. Italy and Spain are also expected to receive large numbers, along with the United Kingdom and Sweden. On the contrary Bulgaria, Croatia, Romania, Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia are expected to be virtually unaffected by the phenomenon.

The top sending country of women with FGM/C will likely be Somalia, with slightly more than 15,000 women in 2016-2020 and an expected overall flow of 60,000 between 2016 and 2030. Importantly, Somalia has a high prevalence of FGM/C defined as type III (Infibulation), the most extreme form of FGM/C with the worst long-term health consequences (UNICEF 2013). Other major flows are expected to originate from Nigeria (around 17,000 in 2016-2020), Mali and Egypt (each around 13,000 in 2016-2020), and Guinea (around 11,000 in 2016-2020). (Table 2)

Conclusions

As a consequence of international migration, Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting (FGM/C) is an issue of rising importance in western societies. In the EU28 countries there may already be more than 500,000 women who experienced FGM/C earlier in their life, and many more may arrive in the future. The strategy to deal with FGM/C in a non-practicing context such as the EU28 is twofold. First, medical assistance must be provided for girls and women who have already undergone FGM/C; second, measures must be taken to prevent this practice in second-generation girls and uncut first-generation migrant children in each country-specific and typical age bracket for cutting .

As the number of women with FGM/C in Europe is expected to rise, it is important to act in good time by designing targeted interventions and policies at national and European levels to assist cut women and protect children. The need for such measures is particularly compelling in France, Italy, Spain, UK and Sweden, which are likely to be the preferred destinations of migrants from FGM/C practicing countries.

References

Andro A., Lesclingand M. (2017). Les mutilations génitales féminines. État des lieux et des connaissances, Population 2016/2 (Vol. 71), p. 217-296.

Berg, R., & Denison, E. (2013). A Tradition in Transition: Factors Perpetuating and Hindering the Continuance of Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting (FGM/C) Summarized in a Systematic Review. Health Care for Women International 34(10): 837-859.

EIGE – European Institute for Gender Equality (2013). Female genital mutilation in the European Union and Croatia Vilnius: EIGE.

Farina, P., Ortensi L.E. (2014). The mother to daughter transmission of Female Genital Cutting in emigration as evidenced by Italian survey data. Genus, 70 (2-3): 111-137.

Johnsdotter, S., Kontiemoussa, A. R., & Essen, B. (2009). “Never my daughters’: a qualitative study regarding attitude change toward female genital cutting among Ethiopian and Eritrean families in Sweden”, Health Care Women International, 30 (1–2): 114–133.

Ortensi L.E., Farina P., Menonna A. (2015). Improving estimates of the prevalence of Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting among migrants in Western countries. Demographic research 32: 543-562.

Ortensi L.E., Menonna A. (2017) Migrating with special needs? Projections of flows of migrant women with Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting towards Europe 2016-2030. European Journal of Population. 33 (4), 559-583 Doi.10.1007/s10680-017-9426-4

UNICEF (2013). Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting: A statistical overview and exploration of the dynamics of change. New York: United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF).

UNICEF (2016). Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting: A Global Concern. New York: United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF).

Van Baelen L., Ortensi L.E., Leye E. (2016) Estimates of first-generation women and girls with female genital mutilation in the European Union, Norway and Switzerland. The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care, DOI: 10.1080/13625187.2016.1234597

image_pdfimage_print

By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. more information

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this.

Close